Compare prices within the same model year
2016
Prices for the Audi RS 7 (2013-2018) show a typical depreciation curve, with earlier models generally priced lower. While newer models command higher prices, there are significant opportunities to find value, especially in the 2015-2016 model years, which often represent a sweet spot between depreciation and remaining modern features. The market appears stable with opportunities for savvy buyers.
Moderate
The Audi RS 7 market within the 2013-2018 range presents a compelling opportunity for performance sedan enthusiasts. With an average price around $38,000 and a wide price spectrum, patience and diligent research are key. Consider models from 2016, which appear to offer a strong balance of features, mileage, and value. Given the average days on market, be prepared for negotiation, especially on listings that have been active for longer periods. Always prioritize a pre-purchase inspection for these high-performance vehicles.
This deal stands out with a strong deal score and significant estimated savings, representing excellent value for a 2016 RS 7 with relatively low mileage for its year. It's priced competitively below the average market price.
This listing offers the second-highest estimated savings among the top deals, making it a financially attractive option. The price is well below the market average, and the mileage is reasonable for a 2016 model.
Although the estimated savings are minimal, this 2016 RS 7 has very low mileage for its age and a strong deal score. Its extended time on the market (210 days) indicates potential flexibility from the dealer.
This 2015 RS 7 is a great find with significantly lower mileage than average (60,923 miles) and a solid deal score. The estimated savings are also noteworthy, making it a strong contender.
This is the newest model year (2018) in the top deals list, offering modern features and a relatively low mileage of 67,878. Despite a shorter estimated saving, its longer days on market (202) could present a negotiation opportunity.
This deal offers the most substantial estimated savings ($8,513) and is priced significantly below the average market price, making it an exceptional value proposition. The mileage is reasonable for a 2015 model.
This 2016 RS 7 stands out with its remarkably low mileage (64,797 miles) and a strong deal score. Although it has only been on the market for 4 days, its value proposition is compelling.
This 2015 RS 7 is a standout due to its exceptionally low mileage (48,094 miles), which is significantly below the market average. It represents a great opportunity for a buyer seeking a well-preserved example.
This 2016 RS 7 has a respectable mileage of 67,906 and a decent deal score. Its relatively short time on market (27 days) suggests it's priced competitively, but a slight negotiation might be possible.
This 2016 RS 7 offers a good balance with 69,005 miles and a respectable deal score. The estimated savings are decent, and its short time on market (17 days) indicates it's priced attractively.
This 2016 RS 7 presents a solid value with 71,978 miles and a good estimated saving. Its 30 days on market suggest it's a fair deal that might have some room for negotiation.
This 2017 RS 7 offers significant estimated savings ($5,128) and is priced well below the average. While the mileage is higher than some others, it's a newer model year and represents a strong value proposition.
This 2017 RS 7 offers substantial estimated savings ($5,324) and is priced very competitively. Although mileage is higher, it's a newer model year and a great opportunity for value.
This 2014 RS 7 is the most affordable option in the list, priced significantly below the average. While it has higher mileage (98,248 miles), it offers substantial estimated savings and has been on the market for a long time (212 days), suggesting negotiation potential.
This 2016 RS 7 offers a significant estimated saving ($5,097) and is priced well below the average. Its higher mileage (81,268 miles) is balanced by its attractive price and long days on market (193), indicating potential for negotiation.
Last analyzed: February 1, 2026